AI Expert Review Board · WebMCP
Your agent convenes the board. You decide what it costs.
This page exposes a multi-model expert review board as WebMCP tools. An agent reads your artifact, argues for a 3, 5, or 7 reviewer panel, and returns consensus alongside the dissent most tools average away.
The constraint that makes this safe
Panel size is resolved server-side from what was purchased. It is not a parameter this page can pass. An agent can read your artifact and argue hard for a seven-reviewer board — but it cannot conjure reviewers nobody paid for. An agent that could both recommend spend and trigger it is an agent you could not leave alone with your card.
What the board costs
More reviewers means more independent reviews, so it takes longer — a seven-seat board is seven separate reviews plus a synthesis pass, not one larger prompt.
| Board | Price | Typical time | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 reviewers | $15 | 45–90 sec | A fast second opinion |
| 5 reviewers | $29 | 1–3 min | Decisions that cross disciplines |
| 7 reviewers | $69 | 2–4 min | One-way doors and wide blast radius |
Buy a single review and subscribe within 30 days, and the full amount you paid becomes account credit.
Sample reviews
Twelve artifacts spanning architecture, policy, security, payments,
accessibility, and incident review — four at each board size, each
board size. Run one live, or ask your agent to
list_sample_artifacts, or pick one.
Running a live review
Judges: enter the demo token from the submission notes to run a real board at no cost. Everyone else is charged the normal rate above.
A token grants review credits to an account, so sign in first, then come back to this page and redeem. Signing in happens on the platform, not here — this page never sees your credentials.